Predicate Research Report · generated 2026-08-22 · Print / save as PDF · Save to account
Applied Biomaterial Technologies — Predicate Candidate Screening
7 FDA 510(k) clearances under this manufacturer; the 50 most recent screened below.
113 daysmedian FDA review time
602 days90th percentile
7clearances measured
| K-number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Review days | Recalls (K-match) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K935571 | DURALASTIC SHEETING | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1995-01-31 | 439 | 0 |
| K945552 | DURALASTIC SHEETING | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1995-01-31 | 82 | 0 |
| K931500 | THE PERMARIDGE MATRIX CHIN | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1994-11-17 | 602 | 0 |
| K913768 | PEC IMPLANT | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1992-02-03 | 165 | 0 |
| K902284 | ZYMALAR IMPLANT | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1990-09-12 | 113 | 0 |
| K902285 | THE MAGNUM CHIN IMPLANT | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1990-09-12 | 113 | 0 |
| K902283 | THE NAUTILUS NASAL IMPLANT | Applied Biomaterial Technologies | 1990-08-14 | 84 | 0 |
Methodology
Recall counts reflect FDA recall records explicitly referencing each K-number; FDA links recalls to K-numbers inconsistently, so 0 means "none found in FDA records," not "never recalled." Data: FDA openFDA, refreshed weekly. Verify decisions of consequence against the primary source. Full candidate set and CSV export: atlasbyauro.com.
Prepared with Atlas
Predicate research, review-time statistics and recall monitoring for 510(k) teams — atlasbyauro.com/fda